DSpace Repository

Sensitivity Analysis of Non-cohesive Sediment Transport Formulae

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pinto, L. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Fortunato, A. B. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Freire, P. pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2007-07-17T14:23:53Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-26T07:39:43Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-20T09:50:11Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-28T14:12:00Z
dc.date.available 2007-07-17T14:23:53Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2010-04-26T07:39:43Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2014-10-20T09:50:11Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2016-04-28T14:12:00Z
dc.date.issued 2006 pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/5868
dc.description.abstract Sand transport models are often based on semi-empirical equilibrium transport formulae that relate sediment fluxes to physical properties such as velocity, depth and characteristic sediment grain sizes. In engineering applications, errors in these physical properties affect the accuracy of the sediment fluxes. The present analysis quantifies error propagation from the input physical properties to the sediment fluxes, determines which ones control the final errors, and provides insight into the relative strengths, weaknesses and limitations of four total load formulae (Ackers and White, Engelund and Hansen, van Rijn, and Karim and Kennedy) and one bed load formulation (van Rijn). The various sources of uncertainty are first investigated individually, in order to pinpoint the key physical properties that control the errors. Since the strong non-linearity of most sand transport formulae precludes analytical approaches, a Monte Carlo method is validated and used in the analysis. Results show that the accuracy in total sediment transport evaluations is mainly determined by errors in the current velocity and in the sediment median grain size. For the bed load transport using the van Rijn formula, errors in the current velocity alone control the final accuracy. In a final set of tests, all physical properties are allowed to vary simultaneously in order to analyze the combined effect of errors. The combined effect of errors in all the physical properties is then compared to an estimate of the errors due to the intrinsic limitations of the formulae. Results show that errors in the physical properties can be dominant for typical uncertainties associated with these properties, particularly for small depths. A comparison between the various formulae reveals that the van Rijn formula is more sensitive to basic physical properties. Hence, it should only be used when physical properties are known with precision. Keywords: Sediment transport models; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty analysis; Monte Carlo method pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorship ****** pt_BR
dc.format.extent 73 bytes pt_BR
dc.format.extent 37 bytes pt_BR
dc.format.mimetype text/plain pt_BR
dc.format.mimetype text/plain pt_BR
dc.language.iso por pt_BR
dc.publisher Continental Shelf Research pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseries ****** pt_BR
dc.rights restrictedAccess pt_BR
dc.title Sensitivity Analysis of Non-cohesive Sediment Transport Formulae pt_BR
dc.type workingPaper pt_BR
dc.identifier.localedicao ****** pt_BR
dc.description.pages 1826-1839 pt_BR
dc.identifier.seminario ****** pt_BR
dc.identifier.local ****** pt_BR
dc.description.volume 26/15 pt_BR
dc.identifier.proc ****** pt_BR
dc.description.data ****** pt_BR
dc.description.price ****** pt_BR


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account