DSpace Repository

(In)compatibilities of the socio-urbanistic process - Methodological challenges

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Menezes, M. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Vasconcelos, L. pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-09T10:46:38Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-22T09:23:31Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-10T09:44:16Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-13T11:25:14Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-09T10:46:38Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2010-04-22T09:23:31Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2014-10-10T09:44:16Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2017-04-13T11:25:14Z
dc.date.issued 2009-07 pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/17223
dc.description.abstract The need to establish an interactive relation between the needs, problems and the social, physical and urban potentialities of the territories requires being transversal, when developing a plan, a project, an intervention and urban management aiming sustainability. Theoretically, interactive approaches to the territory already acquired its own status and support and guide reflection and action. However, the creation of mechanisms for implementation, supporting and developing this interactive and multidimensional principle in/with the territory is still far from easy. This paper draws from the experiences of two Portuguese cases while exploring new innovative ways to develop sustainable public urban policies of socio-territorial intervention in vulnerable critical contexts. The aim is to reflect on the methodological aspects considered fundamental in the context of the preparation and consolidation of socio-territorial intervention dynamics. The authors recur to two case discussing namely the following aspects: (1) interactive objectives confronted with a rigid functional responsibilities strongly centred in technical expertise; (2) assurance of the process continuity towards the implementation of the plan of action collaboratively developed; (3) who should be involved in the identification of needs, problems and urban socio-physical potentialities. The two case studies will be used to illustrate the issues brought up by this reflection. Finally, through the lessons learned from these two experiences, the authors discuss the relevance of the component of technical and methodological support in the context of the construction and consolidation of the participatory process and urban governance. pt_BR
dc.format.extent 21299 bytes pt_BR
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.rights openAccess pt_BR
dc.subject Socio-territorial intervention pt_BR
dc.subject Vulnerable critical contexts pt_BR
dc.subject Methodological support pt_BR
dc.subject Participatory process and urban governance pt_BR
dc.title (In)compatibilities of the socio-urbanistic process - Methodological challenges pt_BR
dc.type conferenceObject pt_BR
dc.identifier.seminario 23 rd Congress of the association of European schools of planning. pt_BR
dc.identifier.local Liverpool, U.K. pt_BR
dc.description.sector DED/NESO pt_BR
dc.description.year 2009 pt_BR
dc.description.data 15 a 18 Julho pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account