DSpace Repository

Evaluating comfort and well-being: A post-occupancy approach for improvements – Insights from 10 residential case studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Neto, M. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Silva, C. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Pinto, A. pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-18T14:54:17Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-27T12:25:28Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-18T14:54:17Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2025-11-27T12:25:28Z
dc.date.issued 2025-07-04 pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113334 pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace2.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018991 pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018991
dc.description.abstract Indoor building environments influence people’s comfort and well-being. These concepts are increasingly being studied comprehensively, and various methods exist to assess them, such as post-occupancy evaluations. This study aims to develop a methodology to identify comfort and well-being parameters that, according to the occupants, require improvement and to suggest improvement measures. The research was conducted in ten dwellings in Portugal. Data collection involved a survey applied in winter and summer, along with indoor temperature measurements over a year. After this data collection, a methodology was developed to categorise comfort and well-being parameters into three priority classes. The results indicate that the proposed method can be applied to different case studies with varying characteristics and occupants. Based on occupant feedback, comfort and well-being parameters that require improvement were identified, allowing the proposal of measures to improve indoor environments. Some measures impact multiple comfort and well-being parameters while influencing energy consumption. Passive solutions or measures that minimise energy use and mitigate increases in energy costs were prioritised. Some of the proposed measures were not initially considered a priority by the occupants. Still, they were recommended as they address specific problems or sources of dissatisfaction identified during the study. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.publisher Elsevier pt_BR
dc.rights openAccess pt_BR
dc.subject Comfort pt_BR
dc.subject Well-being pt_BR
dc.subject POE pt_BR
dc.subject POE pt_BR
dc.title Evaluating comfort and well-being: A post-occupancy approach for improvements – Insights from 10 residential case studies pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.identifier.localedicao online pt_BR
dc.description.sector DED/NAICI pt_BR
dc.description.magazine Building and Environment pt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewed SIM pt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchers SIM pt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivo SIM pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account