DSpace Repository

Is the Volume-of-Fluid Method Coupled with a Sub-Grid Bubble Equation Efficient for Simulating Local and Continuum Aeration?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mendes, L. S. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Lara, J. L. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Viseu, T. pt_BR
dc.contributor.editor Rita F. Carvalho, Corrado Gisonni pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-23T11:34:01Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-01T10:37:07Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-23T11:34:01Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2021-07-01T10:37:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021-05-29 pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation https://doi.org/10.3390/w13111535 pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1013822
dc.description.abstract Air entrainment is common in free surface flows in large hydraulic structures (e.g., spillways, chutes, energy dissipation structures) and must be considered to assure an effective and safe operation. Due to the large size of the prototype structures, it is infeasible to model individual air bubbles. Therefore, using the OpenFOAM toolbox, an efficient simulation model for aerated flows is developed for engineering purposes. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations and the volume-of-fluid method are coupled with a sub-grid bubble population model that simulates entrainment and transport. A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness, computational cost, and reliability is performed. Local and continuum bubble entrainment are evaluated in two distinct flows: an impinging jet and along a spillway chute. Aeration is induced, respectively, by a shear flow and by the thickening of the turbulent boundary layer. Moreover, a detailed sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameters is conducted. Calibration and validation are performed against experimental and prototype data. Among the analyzed entrainment formulations, the one depending exclusively on the turbulent kinetic energy is the only applicable to different flow types. Good accuracy is found, meeting engineering standards, and the additional computation cost is marginal. Results depend primarily on the volume-of-fluid method ability to reproduce the interface. Calibration is straightforward in self-aeration but more difficult for local aeration. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.publisher MDPI pt_BR
dc.rights openAccess pt_BR
dc.subject Local aeration pt_BR
dc.subject Free-surface aeration pt_BR
dc.subject Volume-of-fluid pt_BR
dc.subject Sub-grid bubble equation pt_BR
dc.subject Hydraulic structure pt_BR
dc.title Is the Volume-of-Fluid Method Coupled with a Sub-Grid Bubble Equation Efficient for Simulating Local and Continuum Aeration? pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.description.pages 27p pt_BR
dc.description.comments Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0 pt_BR
dc.description.volume 13, 1535 pt_BR
dc.description.sector DHA/NRE pt_BR
dc.description.magazine WATER pt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewed SIM pt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchers SIM pt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivo SIM pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account