DSpace Repository

Effects of thermal cycles on adhesively bonded joints between pultruded GFRP adherends

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sousa, J. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Correia, J. R. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Firmo, João P. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Cabral-Fonseca, S. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author J. GONILHA pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-24T17:21:39Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-05T15:01:15Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-24T17:21:39Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2021-04-05T15:01:15Z
dc.date.issued 2018-02-27 pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.081 pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1013602
dc.description.abstract This paper presents an experimental study about the effects of thermal cycles on adhesively bonded joints between pultruded glass fibre reinforced polyester (GFRP) adherends used in civil engineering structural applications. Single lap bonded joints were produced with two commercial polymeric adhesives - epoxy (EP) and polyurethane (PUR) - and exposed to a mild (Mediterranean) range of thermal variations (-5 °C to 40 °C) for up to 350 cycles in a dry condition. The mechanical performance of the adhesively bonded joints was assessed by means of single lap shear tests. Regardless of the inherent differences between both adhesives, results obtained show that the global effect of thermal cycles on the load vs. displacement response of EP-GFRP and PUR-GFRP joints was similar. For both adhesives, thermal cycles caused considerable reduction of joint stiffness and strength, with maximum reductions of 18% and 22% for EP-GFRP joints, respectively, and 19% and 11% for PUR GFRP joints. The degradation of performance was influenced by post-curing effects, more relevant in the PUR adhesive. Before exposure to thermal cycles, both types of specimens exhibited similar failure mechanisms, which generally (80-90% of cases) involved light fibre tear and fibre tear modes, attesting the effectiveness of the adhesion process and material compatibility. Exposure to thermal cycles did not influence the failure modes of the PUR-GFRP joints; however, EP-GFRP joints became more prone to adhesive failure after being subjected to thermal cycles. Overall, the results obtained indicate that thermal cycles degrade bonded joints between pultruded GFRP adherends; however, for the conditions used in this study, this degradation seems to be compatible with the structural use of this type of joints in civil infrastructure. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd pt_BR
dc.rights restrictedAccess pt_BR
dc.subject Pultruded GFRP adherends pt_BR
dc.subject Polyurethane pt_BR
dc.subject Epoxy pt_BR
dc.subject Adesively bonded joints pt_BR
dc.subject Thermal cycles pt_BR
dc.subject Durability pt_BR
dc.title Effects of thermal cycles on adhesively bonded joints between pultruded GFRP adherends pt_BR
dc.type workingPaper pt_BR
dc.description.pages 518-529 pt_BR
dc.description.volume 202 pt_BR
dc.description.sector DM/NMO pt_BR
dc.description.magazine Composite Structures pt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewed SIM pt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchers SIM pt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivo NAO pt_BR


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account