| dc.contributor.author |
Viegas, R.M. C.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author |
Campinas, M.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author |
Coelho, R.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author |
Rosa, M. J.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-02-01T12:08:25Z |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-04-01T09:11:06Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2021-02-01T12:08:25Z |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.available |
2021-04-01T09:11:06Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2021-01 |
pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.citation |
doi.org/10.3390/membranes11020072 |
pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1013447 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Two pilot trials of powdered activated carbon (PAC)/(coagulation)/ceramic microfiltration were conducted to compare continuous 10–12 mg/L PAC inline dosing with 8–10 mg/L dosing to a 2 h-contact tank. Two low turbidity/low natural organic matter (NOM, total organic carbon <2 mg C/L) surface waters spiked with 7.2–10.3 µg/L total-pesticides were tested and the dosing options were compared towards operational performance, average removal of pesticides and NOM and costs. |
pt_BR |
| dc.language.iso |
eng |
pt_BR |
| dc.publisher |
MDPI |
pt_BR |
| dc.rights |
restrictedAccess |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Powdered activated carbon/coagulation/microfiltration |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Hybrid membrane process |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Pesticides |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Ceramic membranes |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Inline |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Tank |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
PAC dosing options |
pt_BR |
| dc.title |
Hybrid Process of Adsorption/Coagulation/Ceramic MF for Removing Pesticides in Drinking Water Treatment—Inline vs. Contact Tank PAC Dosing |
pt_BR |
| dc.type |
workingPaper |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.pages |
21 pp. |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.volume |
11(2) |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.sector |
DHA/NES |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.magazine |
membranes |
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.peer-reviewed |
NAO |
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.academicresearchers |
NAO |
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.arquivo |
NAO |
pt_BR |