DSpace Repository

The Economic Appraisal of Health Benefits of Non-Motorized Transport Modes: key methodological challenges

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Arsénio, E. pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-03T10:41:09Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-21T09:03:19Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-13T12:07:33Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-03T10:41:09Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2014-10-21T09:03:19Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2017-04-13T12:07:33Z
dc.date.issued 2013-05-01 pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation ARSENIO, E.; Ribeiro, P.; Mendes, J. F. (2013). The economic appraisal of health benefits of non-motorized transport modes: key methodological challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, EURO WG on Transportation, Elsevier. pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1004709
dc.description.abstract The economic appraisal of the external effects of transport options can provide important data for policy making. On the other hand, impacts of non-motorized modes have often been undervalued in comparison to other transport modes. To this end, assessing the potential health benefits of walking and cycling is being increasingly recognized as an important step to promote sustainable mobility policies. This paper is built upon the contracted study for the World Health Organization (WHO) on the economic appraisal of health benefits of walking and cycling investments for the City of Viana do Castelo. This Portuguese city which integrates the WHO European Healthy Cities Network provided a suitable policy context for the former application in Portugal of the WHO Health Economic Assessment Model (HEAT) for appraising the health benefits of non-motorized transport. The study comprised the evaluation of the following investment actions: a) Improvements of the urban public space for pedestrians; b) Planning future cycling infrastructures. This paper provides a discussion of the methodological challenges and key findings that have arisen from the WHO HEAT application study, when trying to answer the following questions: - If x people cycle (or walk) a distance of y kilometers on most days, what is the economic value of the correspondent health benefits? - What levels of uptake of cycling in the future are required for the cycling plan to be economic viable? - What health benefits are associated to a projected increase in the traffic levels of pedestrians (% increase from the reference level)? - Do health benefits of cycling (and walking) investments outweigh their costs? Results from this study make it able to add novel evidence for the Portuguese urban context on the potential health benefits of walking and cycling (maximum and mean annual health benefits), including the cost-benefit ratio indicators. These indicators are expected to be useful for policy makers and city officers involved in the promotion of sustainable mobility. pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorship Organização Mundial de Saúde/World Health Organization. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.publisher Elsevier pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseries ;2013 pt_BR
dc.rights openAccess pt_BR
dc.subject Economic appraisal pt_BR
dc.subject Cost-benefit analysis pt_BR
dc.subject Health benefits pt_BR
dc.subject Sustainable mobility pt_BR
dc.subject Non-motorized modes pt_BR
dc.subject Walking and cycling pt_BR
dc.title The Economic Appraisal of Health Benefits of Non-Motorized Transport Modes: key methodological challenges pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.description.figures 0 pt_BR
dc.description.tables 2 Quadros. pt_BR
dc.description.pages 10 pt_BR
dc.description.comments Artigo aceite para publicação em 10-02-2013. pt_BR
dc.description.volume Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences 2013 pt_BR
dc.description.sector DT/NPTS pt_BR
dc.identifier.proc 0703/11/17773 pt_BR
dc.description.magazine Procedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account