DSpace Repository

Water Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Period

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gonçalves, T. D. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Brito, V. pt_BR
dc.contributor.author Pel, L. pt_BR
dc.contributor.editor Drying Technology: An International Journal pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-22T15:20:10Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-20T15:57:30Z pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-12T15:55:49Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-22T15:20:10Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2014-10-20T15:57:30Z pt_BR
dc.date.available 2017-04-12T15:55:49Z
dc.date.issued 2012-02-17 pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation T. Diaz Gonçalves,V. Brito, L. Pel (2012) Water Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Period Drying Technology, 30: 462–474. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2011.647184. pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn ISSN: 0737-3937 print; 1532-2300 online pt_BR
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1003207
dc.description.abstract It has long been thought that the evaporation rate from mesoporous materials during the constant drying rate period (CDRP) is equal to that of a free-water surface, due to the presence of a liquid film covering the surface of the material. In this article we review several early articles and demonstrate that the experimental scrutiny this hypothesis has received is insufficient. Further, we report a set of evaporative drying experiments on eight building materials whose results also do not confirm such hypothesis. Indeed, the drying rate during the CDRP is not equal either among the tested materials or between these and the free-water surfaces. To explain the differences in drying rate, we have looked at the influence of surface texture and porosity. We have concluded that surface texture, which could increase the effective surface area of the materials, did not have a relevant effect on the CDRP drying rate. However, we have found a good correlation between the CDRP drying rate and capillary porosity. This is consistent with the hypothesis that drying occurs at the pore level during the CDRP. Further, it contradicts the suggestion that there is a film of water covering the surface of the materials during this period. pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorship ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the research project DRYMASS (ref. PTDC/ECM/100553/2008). V. Brito was supported by a research grant provided under this project. We are thankful to Jo Ann Cassar (from University of Malta) for providing the Globigerina limestone samples and to Veerle Cnudde (from Ghent University) and Timo G. Nijland (from the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research) for providing the Bentheimer sandstone samples. We also thank Ceraˆmica do Vale de Gandara for providing the brick samples. Finally, we acknowledge the support of National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (LNEC) technicians who helped with different aspects of the experimental work: Luís Nunes, Joaão Júnior, José Costa, and Joaão Ribeiro. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis pt_BR
dc.rights openAccess pt_BR
dc.subject Constant drying rate period pt_BR
dc.subject Drying rate pt_BR
dc.subject Heat and mass transfer pt_BR
dc.subject Pore network pt_BR
dc.subject Porous media pt_BR
dc.title Water Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Period pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.description.figures 19 pt_BR
dc.description.tables 3 pt_BR
dc.description.pages 12 pt_BR
dc.description.volume 30 pt_BR
dc.description.sector DM/NPC pt_BR
dc.description.magazine Drying Technology pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account