| dc.contributor.author |
Gonçalves, T. D.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author |
Brito, V.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author |
Pel, L.
|
pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.editor |
Drying Technology: An International Journal |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-02-22T15:20:10Z |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-10-20T15:57:30Z |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2017-04-12T15:55:49Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2012-02-22T15:20:10Z |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.available |
2014-10-20T15:57:30Z |
pt_BR |
| dc.date.available |
2017-04-12T15:55:49Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2012-02-17 |
pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.citation |
T. Diaz Gonçalves,V. Brito, L. Pel (2012) Water Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Period Drying Technology, 30: 462–474. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2011.647184. |
pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.issn |
ISSN: 0737-3937 print; 1532-2300 online |
pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1003207 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
It has long been thought that the evaporation rate from mesoporous
materials during the constant drying rate period (CDRP) is
equal to that of a free-water surface, due to the presence of a liquid
film covering the surface of the material. In this article we review
several early articles and demonstrate that the experimental scrutiny
this hypothesis has received is insufficient. Further, we report
a set of evaporative drying experiments on eight building materials
whose results also do not confirm such hypothesis. Indeed, the drying
rate during the CDRP is not equal either among the tested materials
or between these and the free-water surfaces. To explain the
differences in drying rate, we have looked at the influence of surface
texture and porosity. We have concluded that surface texture, which
could increase the effective surface area of the materials, did not
have a relevant effect on the CDRP drying rate. However, we have
found a good correlation between the CDRP drying rate and capillary
porosity. This is consistent with the hypothesis that drying
occurs at the pore level during the CDRP. Further, it contradicts
the suggestion that there is a film of water covering the surface of
the materials during this period. |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.sponsorship |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the research project DRYMASS (ref. PTDC/ECM/100553/2008). V. Brito
was supported by a research grant provided under this project.
We are thankful to Jo Ann Cassar (from University of Malta) for providing the Globigerina limestone samples and to Veerle Cnudde (from Ghent University) and Timo
G. Nijland (from the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research) for providing the Bentheimer
sandstone samples. We also thank Ceraˆmica do Vale de Gandara for providing the brick samples.
Finally, we acknowledge the support of National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (LNEC) technicians who helped with different aspects of the experimental work: Luís Nunes, Joaão Júnior, José Costa, and Joaão Ribeiro. |
pt_BR |
| dc.language.iso |
eng |
pt_BR |
| dc.publisher |
Taylor & Francis |
pt_BR |
| dc.rights |
openAccess |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Constant drying rate period |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Drying rate |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Heat and mass transfer |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Pore network |
pt_BR |
| dc.subject |
Porous media |
pt_BR |
| dc.title |
Water Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Period |
pt_BR |
| dc.type |
article |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.figures |
19 |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.tables |
3 |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.pages |
12 |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.volume |
30 |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.sector |
DM/NPC |
pt_BR |
| dc.description.magazine |
Drying Technology |
pt_BR |